国内我的网站主页 > 我的网站国内 >
摘要:上海滩...

亚马逊

不干了!新西兰警察威胁要怠工!不打击黑帮、不开罚单!只因……_我的网站

进击的巨人

A |     

As government scrutiny and even some statewide TikTok bans trickle in, concerns about the app’s impact on youth mental health are often repeated. Among the concerned are the bereft parents of a teen who killed himself last year, reportedly after seeing self-harm content on TikTok.
While states and some organizations decide whether TikTok poses enough danger to warrant a ban, I want to sound the alarm about an online mental health risk that’s even more chronic and not limited to TikTok: an epidemic of self-diagnosis, fueled by social media, that’s leading to improper treatment, missed treatment and the trivialization of serious mental health conditions.
If there’s a silver lining to the COVID-era mental health crisis, it’s that people seem more willing than ever to talk about mental health struggles with friends, with colleagues and sometimes to the whole world online. Even better, they’re willing to get help. The percentage of adults aged 18 to 44 seeking mental health treatment rose significantly during the first years of the pandemic, according to data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
If you spend any time online, you can’t miss the new candor about mental health conditions. TikTok and Instagram influencers share their struggles and diagnoses on camera. In recent years, executives on LinkedIn have shared photos of antidepressant medication with the hashtag #PostYourPill. Actor-singer-beauty mogul Selena Gomez launched an entire content platform focused on “mental fitness.” Conditions such as anxiety disorder, ADHD and OCD are not only being de-stigmatized, in some contexts, they’re trending.
Open discussion of mental health is undoubtedly a good thing when it eradicates shame, results in people feeling less alone or motivates somebody to seek needed professional care. But in this new era of openness, we risk oversimplification and even trivialization of complex medical conditions, increasing the risk of overtreatment for some, undertreatment for others and overall mistreatment of people exposed to a cacophony of mental health conversations online but lacking access to balanced, authoritative information and quality clinical care.
Let’s say a young woman perusing TikTok sees an influencer sharing that he has attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, then – thanks to social media algorithms – over the next week, more ADHD-related content appears in the young woman’s feed. Some of the symptoms feel relatable, so she does a YouTube search on ADHD. After watching a few of the thousands of videos on the topic, she decides that she herself has ADHD.
This is not unusual. Some therapists at Talkspace, where I serve as the chief medical officer, report they have clients coming to sessions with more complex or specific self-diagnoses. Whereas a client might have said, “I think I’m depressed,” a few years ago, now more are saying, “I think I have borderline personality disorder” or “I think I’m on the autism spectrum.”
Such self-diagnosis can be dangerous. When a social media user becomes convinced that they have a mental health disorder, it can lead them to seek inappropriate treatments. They may announce their self-diagnosis to a primary care provider who doesn’t have sufficient mental health expertise to appropriately evaluate the presenting symptoms. Or the patient may wind up using a telehealth provider to get a prescription medication that’s not helpful or is dangerous. In the case of the hypothetical young woman above, she’d likely be seeing ads for ADHD-focused telehealth prescribers within days, if not minutes, of initially engaging with ADHD influencers.
Diagnosing a mental health disorder isn’t as simple as checking off a list of symptoms. Many healthy people experience symptoms of a mental health condition, but the true measure of whether those symptoms merit a diagnosis and treatment is whether they impair the individual’s ability to function. That determination requires working with a licensed mental health professional to evaluate the frequency, intensity, severity and specificity of those symptoms, and understand them within the broader context of life events, stressors and family history.
A “reel” diagnosis needs a real-life one
To address the “TikTok effect” and stop the dangers of self-diagnosis, mental health professionals must meet people where they are: online and actively searching for answers, inadvertently creating a curated feed.
Social media companies and other platforms with user-generated content have a responsibility to create guardrails that ensure clinically-vetted and accurate information is within reach of anybody seeking content about mental health conditions.
For example, if you enter the search terms “depression” or “suicide” into Instagram, you’re offered a list of mental health resources. However, searches related to specific conditions like OCD, ADHD and Tourette’s link directly to memes and user-generated videos of (to put it generously) mixed quality. Since the start of the pandemic, we’ve seen how quickly social platforms could flag content related to COVID or vaccines and direct people to CDC information on those topics. Therefore, it does not seem unreasonable to expect the same for content around sensitive mental health topics.
When somebody hears about a condition online and believes, correctly or not, that it affects them, they are more likely to feel worried, triggered or even distraught. Thankfully, that same technology can quickly link them with mental health care without stigma or stress and allow them to find real answers under a professional’s guidance – if they land at a responsible, high-quality source of tele-mental health. We recently revamped our own site to provide clinical insights from a dedicated team of licensed, practicing clinicians to add dimension to the spectrum between experiencing symptoms and having a condition.
Unfortunately, some telehealth services are all too quick to prescribe medications, including controlled substances, based solely on answers to online questions. At Talkspace, I am personally committed to our policy of not prescribing controlled substances online. When our board-certified psychiatrists and psychiatric nurse practitioners do prescribe medication, it is only after live video consultations and a comprehensive psychiatric evaluation.
Because mental health conditions are so much more complex than what can be captured by a checklist of symptoms, I’m wary of any company that prescribes without live consultations. When digital health companies feed into the misconception that everyone with depressive symptoms is clinically depressed or anyone who’s easily distracted has ADHD, they risk hurting more people than they help.
At a time when it’s all too easy for both the worried well and people with serious mental health conditions to self-diagnose online, it’s imperative that both social media and digital health companies do everything possible to direct vulnerable audiences to trustworthy information and comprehensive, ethical care.
。    转自公众号:新西兰中文先驱Chinese_Herald          昨天,新西兰警察工会拒绝了政府提出的涨薪方案,怒称这一提议是“侮辱”、“恶心”、“简直是一个笑话”。         Advertise with us          据悉,已有警察表示要罢工,但警察罢工又是非法的,所以他们准备消极怠工、不开罚单、不加班……                    01          加薪方案谈了约一年          据报道,新西兰警察协会(Police Association),也就是警察工会组织,与政府谈判了约一年。         去年9月,上届工党政府提出方案是从2023年4月起,涨薪4000纽币,然后自2024年4月起再涨薪4%。         但这个方案没有让警察协会接受,双方继续谈,一直谈到新政府上台。         上周五,新政府给出方案:          在2023年11月的基础上,加薪5000纽币,津贴增加 5.25%(不回溯至 7 月 1 日)。         从2024年9月1日起工资进一步上涨4%,津贴增加4%(推迟,从2024年7月1日起不再生效)          然后从2025年7月起,最终工资上涨4%,津贴增加4%。         另外还有用报销费用代替所有餐费和杂费,将现有45天的休假累积减少至35天。

B |                    02          警察们很生气          这个方案出来,把警察协会给气炸了。         新西兰警察协会主席Chris Cahill(下图)表示,经过数月的努力,竟然谈出这样的提议,对警方来说,简直是“一记重击”、“滑稽”、“不尊重”和“绝对是一个笑话”。         图片来源:NZME          Cahill表示,在消防员、护士和教师加薪后,警察们也耐心等待了几个月,才得到一份报价。         他说这个方案实际上要低于他们去年9月拒绝的那份。

C |          Cahill说,政府“严厉打击犯罪”的立场意味着警察的工作要求更高。         “然而,他们故意不回溯因政府程序推迟的薪酬,从而侮辱了这些警官。”          “6年后的护士或社会工作者的收入都会比警察多 22,000纽币。”          “没有人认为护士工资过高,那为什么我们的警察工资过低呢?当警察达到最高工资水平时,他们的收入将比护士少 24 万纽币。”          Cahill说,政府要想兑现两年内再招募 500 名警官的承诺,就需要确保警官不会为了更好的薪酬和条件而离开。         他还表示,许多警察面临着极大的财务压力,导致无力支付租金或抵押贷款,有人还求助于食品包裹。         ”何况还有许多警察还感受到了隔壁澳大利亚的诱惑。”          Cahill说,警察人员每年通常都会有约 5% 的员工流失,他预计未来几个月离职人数会激增,要么移居海外,要么转向其他职业。         据介绍,警察协会已接到大量抗议信。         一位在北岛担任侦探、已在警队工作了十多年的警官表示,他听到政府给的方案很生气。         他说,同事们正在考虑搬到澳大利亚。         他说,在职警察中现在有传言称,警官们将拒绝加班,拒绝执行政府打击帮派的新举措,或拒绝开出停车罚单,以限制政府的收入。

D |          警察协会呼吁警察们在未来几天提供反馈,并计划下周与警察管理层会面。         Cahill表示:“这次会议的结果对于决定我们下一步的行动至关重要。”                    03          警察部长:政府很穷          警察部长Mark Mitchell对此回应,政府正面临严峻的经济状况。

E |          图片来源:NZ Herald          “我们百分百支持并认可我们所有的警察,他们为我们做了出色的工作。

F | 但作为新上任的政府,我们的财务状况十分严峻。

G | 我们希望开始改善我们国家的经济前景,”他说。         “我们站在他们(警察)一边。

H | 我们百分百支持他们。我们正在尽力而为。”          政府坚称不会违背招募更多警察的承诺。         昨天,总理Christopher Luxon在电视AM 节目中,为政府的薪酬提议进行了辩护。         他说:“我们正在做的是确保为警察提供更多工具并为他们提供支持,我们已经看到,在我们的帮派立法、上周提交议会的非法枪支立法以及我们针对青少年所做的工作方面,我们都做到了这一点。”          “所以警方知道他们将得到本届政府的支持,以应对我们在全国各地看到的暴力和青少年犯罪。”          总理否认了警察协会关于联合政府的薪酬与工党提供的薪酬相同的说法。         Luxon说:“我不同意,警方已经提出了一项增强的提议,这也是他们与警察协会合作解决的一个问题。”          原文链接          相关阅读:          警方的这些员工强烈要求加薪,不满意就也要罢工?          更高的薪水,免费的住房,比新西兰警察待遇好太多,澳大利亚来抢人才了!          澳洲来新西兰挖人,警察部长表示不太担心,工会笑不出来…          天气更好,起薪翻倍,还给搬家费!澳洲警方大打广告,招聘新西兰的警察啦!          年薪2倍!免费住房!澳洲抢走新西兰护士后,又要抢他们……          注:本文为编译/原创,欢迎转发分享;但严禁复制等未经授权的非法使用。

I | 违反上述声明者,本网将追究其相关法律责任。使用授权请联系[email protected]。         chineseherald.co.nz All Rights Reserved 版权所有          (责编:twinkle)          来源 - 先驱自媒          相关内容                前绿党议员对所有入店行窃指控认罪           奥克兰海湾发现神秘尸袋!打开冒出一只人手!           极地冷空气涌入,今年迄今最冷的周末来了!           Chlöe Swarbrick的崛起之路:她是如何成长为绿党新任联合党魁的?           又一起!5人持械抢劫奥克兰一家加油站,员工被威胁           LATAM航班高空惊魂:飞机剧烈晃动,乘客被抛向空中,有人浑身是血           更新:一架飞往奥克兰的航班约50人受伤!           疫情通报:过去一周新西兰新增4803例。

Current article:http://30imu.zhouangnaoguangsundianzhenmou.cfd/i6w/js5.html

Published on:05:50:20